What is your answer?

Intuitionists about ethics claim that

    { 1 } - we have no knowledge of ethical truths.
    { 2 } - ethical statements can be translated into non-ethical statements.
    { 3 } - we can know ethical truths through moral intuition.
    { 4 } - facts about our feelings can be evidence for ethical beliefs.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Intuitionists about ethics claim that

This is skepticism, not intuitionism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Intuitionists about ethics claim that

    { 1 } - we have no knowledge of ethical truths.
    { 2 } - ethical statements can be translated into non-ethical statements.
    { 3 } - we can know ethical truths through moral intuition.
    { 4 } - facts about our feelings can be evidence for ethical beliefs.

This is reductionism, not intuitionism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

Intuitionists about ethics claim that

    { 1 } - we have no knowledge of ethical truths.
    { 2 } - ethical statements can be translated into non-ethical statements.
    { 3 } - we can know ethical truths through moral intuition.
    { 4 } - facts about our feelings can be evidence for ethical beliefs.

The intuitionist could argue this way:

    We have knowledge of some ethical truths.
    Experience and reason don't yield such knowledge.
    So we have an additional source of knowledge.
This was the view of G.E. Moore.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Intuitionists about ethics claim that

    { 1 } - we have no knowledge of ethical truths.
    { 2 } - ethical statements can be translated into non-ethical statements.
    { 3 } - we can know ethical truths through moral intuition.
    { 4 } - facts about our feelings can be evidence for ethical beliefs.

This is critical cognitivism, not intuitionism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end