According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
Solitary is a game, but isn't competitive.
According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
Some professional sports are done mainly for money.
According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
Dice is all luck, chess is all skill.
According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
Some games lack one or another of these characteristics. For example, solitary isn't competitive, dice is all luck, chess is all skill, and professional sports are sometimes done mainly for money. So we can't define "game" in strict terms -- but only in terms of looser "family resemblances" that tend to characterize games.
The Tractatus distinguished between simple terms (which presumably relate directly to experience) and complex ones (which are strictly definable using simple terms). Wittgenstein now sees that many terms, like "game," fit in neither category.
According to the later Wittgenstein, we can define "game" as what
Some games lack one or another of these characteristics. For example, solitary isn't competitive, dice is all luck, chess is all skill, and professional sports are sometimes done mainly for money. So we can't define "game" in strict terms -- but only in terms of looser "family resemblances" that tend to characterize games.
The Tractatus distinguished between simple terms (which presumably relate directly to experience) and complex ones (which are strictly definable using simple terms). Wittgenstein now sees that many terms, like "game," fit in neither category.