What is your answer?

Suppose that kindness is good and that God commands it. Socrates would say that

    { 1 } - God commands kindness because kindness is good.
    { 2 } - kindness is good because God commands it.
    { 3 } - both of the above.
    { 4 } - neither of the above.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

Suppose that kindness is good and that God commands it. Socrates would say that

Here God commands kindness because he knows that it's good. His will doesn't make it good. Instead, he wouldn't command it if it weren't already good.

But then kindness is good prior to and independently of God's will. It would presumably be good even if there were no God.

This alternative involves giving up supernaturalism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Suppose that kindness is good and that God commands it. Socrates would say that

    { 1 } - God commands kindness because kindness is good.
    { 2 } - kindness is good because God commands it.
    { 3 } - both of the above.
    { 4 } - neither of the above.

Then kindness wouldn't be good if God didn't command it.

On SN, things are neither good nor good prior to God's desires. Instead, God's will makes things good or bad. If God commanded hatred and not kindness, then hatred would be good instead of kindness.

This SN answer, while possible, seems to make ethics arbitrary.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Suppose that kindness is good and that God commands it. Socrates would say that

    { 1 } - God commands kindness because kindness is good.
    { 2 } - kindness is good because God commands it.
    { 3 } - both of the above.
    { 4 } - neither of the above.

No, he would say just one.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Suppose that kindness is good and that God commands it. Socrates would say that

    { 1 } - God commands kindness because kindness is good.
    { 2 } - kindness is good because God commands it.
    { 3 } - both of the above.
    { 4 } - neither of the above.

No, he would say one of these.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end