What is your answer?

Ima Intuitionist claims that we should accept as self-evident any principle that seems plausible to us initially.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Intuitionist claims that we should accept as self-evident any principle that seems plausible to us initially.

What is plausible to us initially may have implausible implications. For example, "-(x*y) = (-x*-y)" may seem right at first. But it gives a false result if we let x and y both be 2.

Instead of relying on initial plausibility, we need to examine a principle (whether of math or of ethics) to see whether it has implications that clash with our intuitions.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

Ima Intuitionist claims that we should accept as self-evident any principle that seems plausible to us initially.

What is plausible to us initially may have implausible implications. For example, "-(x*y) = (-x*-y)" may seem right at first. But it gives a false result if we let x and y both be 2.

Instead of relying on initial plausibility, we need to examine a principle (whether of math or of ethics) to see whether it has implications that clash with our intuitions.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end