What is your answer?
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
You really missed the point!
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
Huh? Even my goldfish knew that this guess was wrong.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
The two are very different. A prima facie duty holds in most cases, but not under some extenuating circumstances.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
A prima facie principle might be true.
A prima facie duty is one that holds if other things are equal. So "at first glance" ("prima facie") an act of keeping a promise seems to be your duty, but at second glance (after we look at conflicting duties) it might not be.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
A "prima facie" duty is
{ 1 } - a rule of thumb that is justified on utilitarian grounds.
{ 2 } - a duty to give the "best face" (self-integrity).
{ 3 } - an exceptionless duty.
{ 4 } - a false principle that seems true "at first glance."
{ 5 } - a duty that holds other things being equal.
Ima Rossian gives the example of promise keeping. The fact that you made a promise tends in itself to make it a duty to fulfill the promise. This can sometimes be overridden by other factors. However it isn't automatically overridden if some other action would have better consequences.
A prima facie duty is a factor that tends in itself to make something our duty but can sometimes be overridden by other factors.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end