What is your answer?

Some people claim that a fetus is "human life," in a sense, but not in any sense that has serious moral implications.

So it's possible to affirm that a fetus is human life, but still be strongly pro-abortion.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

Some people claim that a fetus is "human life," in a sense, but not in any sense that has serious moral implications.

So it's possible to affirm that a fetus is human life, but still be strongly pro-abortion.

Many people take this approach. They admit that the fetus is "human life" -- but only in a trivial sense of the term that has no serious moral relevance. They say that the principle "Killing human life is seriously wrong" requires a stronger sense of the term and doesn't apply to the unborn. So they point to an ambiguity in the word "human."

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Some people claim that a fetus is "human life," in a sense, but not in any sense that has serious moral implications.

So it's possible to affirm that a fetus is human life, but still be strongly pro-abortion.

Many people take this approach. They admit that the fetus is "human life" -- but only in a trivial sense of the term that has no serious moral relevance. They say that the principle "Killing human life is seriously wrong" requires a stronger sense of the term and doesn't apply to the unborn. So they point to an ambiguity in the word "human."

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end