Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.
Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.
This is how prescriptivism would approach the issue.
Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.
Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.
Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.
Moral judgments are prescriptions (or imperatives), not truth claims. But their logical structure gives us a way to reason about moral issues, like abortion, by appealing to consistency and the golden rule.