What is the best match?

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

    { 1 } - An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty
    { 2 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
    { 3 } - What can be justifiably demanded of others
    { 4 } - A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you
    { 5 } - Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

ethics of virtue <=> An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

    { 1 } - An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty
    { 2 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
    { 3 } - What can be justifiably demanded of others
    { 4 } - A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you
    { 5 } - Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

intrinsically good <=> What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

    { 1 } - An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty
    { 2 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
    { 3 } - What can be justifiably demanded of others
    { 4 } - A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you
    { 5 } - Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

right <=> What can be justifiably demanded of others

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

    { 1 } - An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty
    { 2 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
    { 3 } - What can be justifiably demanded of others
    { 4 } - A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you
    { 5 } - Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

wrath <=> A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is correct!

nonconsequentialism (deontology)

    { 1 } - An approach to ethics that emphasizes virtue; an extreme ethics of virtue would say that "virtue" is primary, duty is derivative, and we could without loss dispense with talking about duty
    { 2 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
    { 3 } - What can be justifiably demanded of others
    { 4 } - A vengeful and hateful anger toward one who has wronged you
    { 5 } - Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

nonconsequentialism (deontology) <=> Some kinds of action (such as killing the innocent) are wrong in themselves, and not just wrong because they have bad consequences

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end