What is the best match?

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

    { 1 } - cultural-relativism justification
    { 2 } - self-interested-desire justification
    { 3 } - prescriptivism justification
    { 4 } - emotivism justification
    { 5 } - divine-command-theory justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

We ought to be conscientious because society demands this (perhaps for the sake of its survival). <=> cultural-relativism justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

    { 1 } - cultural-relativism justification
    { 2 } - self-interested-desire justification
    { 3 } - prescriptivism justification
    { 4 } - emotivism justification
    { 5 } - divine-command-theory justification

We strive for conscientiousness because it promotes our own well-being and self-respect -- and because it earns us the respect and appreciation of others. <=> self-interested-desire justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

    { 1 } - cultural-relativism justification
    { 2 } - self-interested-desire justification
    { 3 } - prescriptivism justification
    { 4 } - emotivism justification
    { 5 } - divine-command-theory justification

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency. <=> prescriptivism justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

    { 1 } - cultural-relativism justification
    { 2 } - self-interested-desire justification
    { 3 } - prescriptivism justification
    { 4 } - emotivism justification
    { 5 } - divine-command-theory justification

Our judgments in favor of conscientiousness express our (actual or ideal) feelings in favor of it. <=> emotivism justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is wrong. Please try again.

Since an ought judgment is a prescription that logically entails the corresponding imperative (and not a factual claim), ought judgments logically commit us to action under pain of inconsistency. Thus conscientiousness is justified as a species of logical consistency.

    { 1 } - cultural-relativism justification
    { 2 } - self-interested-desire justification
    { 3 } - prescriptivism justification
    { 4 } - emotivism justification
    { 5 } - divine-command-theory justification

We ought to be conscientious because God desire this. <=> divine-command-theory justification

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end