What is your answer?
Universalizability claims that
{ 1 } - if an act ought to be done, then it has some set of universal properties such that any act that had set of properties also ought to be done.
{ 2 } - whether an act is right or wrong depends on reasons or principles that would apply to similar cases -- regardless of the specific individuals involved.
{ 3 } - if an act ought to be done, then any other act relevantly or exactly similar in its universal properties also ought to be done.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Universalizability claims that
{ 1 } - if an act ought to be done, then it has some set of universal properties such that any act that had set of properties also ought to be done.
{ 2 } - whether an act is right or wrong depends on reasons or principles that would apply to similar cases -- regardless of the specific individuals involved.
{ 3 } - if an act ought to be done, then any other act relevantly or exactly similar in its universal properties also ought to be done.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
The other formulations are OK too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Universalizability claims that
{ 1 } - if an act ought to be done, then it has some set of universal properties such that any act that had set of properties also ought to be done.
{ 2 } - whether an act is right or wrong depends on reasons or principles that would apply to similar cases -- regardless of the specific individuals involved.
{ 3 } - if an act ought to be done, then any other act relevantly or exactly similar in its universal properties also ought to be done.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
The other formulations are OK too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Universalizability claims that
{ 1 } - if an act ought to be done, then it has some set of universal properties such that any act that had set of properties also ought to be done.
{ 2 } - whether an act is right or wrong depends on reasons or principles that would apply to similar cases -- regardless of the specific individuals involved.
{ 3 } - if an act ought to be done, then any other act relevantly or exactly similar in its universal properties also ought to be done.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
The other formulations are OK too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Universalizability claims that
{ 1 } - if an act ought to be done, then it has some set of universal properties such that any act that had set of properties also ought to be done.
{ 2 } - whether an act is right or wrong depends on reasons or principles that would apply to similar cases -- regardless of the specific individuals involved.
{ 3 } - if an act ought to be done, then any other act relevantly or exactly similar in its universal properties also ought to be done.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
All three formulations make the same point.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end