What is your answer?
The amoralist refuses to make moral judgments. The problem with being an amoralist, according to Hare, is that
{ 1 } - rationality demands that we make moral judgments on our actions -- that we at least believe that what we are doing is permissible.
{ 2 } - we can't then make moral judgments to protect our own interests.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The amoralist refuses to make moral judgments. The problem with being an amoralist, according to Hare, is that
{ 1 } - rationality demands that we make moral judgments on our actions -- that we at least believe that what we are doing is permissible.
{ 2 } - we can't then make moral judgments to protect our own interests.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
This is Gensler's view, not Hare's.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
The amoralist refuses to make moral judgments. The problem with being an amoralist, according to Hare, is that
{ 1 } - rationality demands that we make moral judgments on our actions -- that we at least believe that what we are doing is permissible.
{ 2 } - we can't then make moral judgments to protect our own interests.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
In practice, almost all of us want to protect our interests through moral judgments.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The amoralist refuses to make moral judgments. The problem with being an amoralist, according to Hare, is that
{ 1 } - rationality demands that we make moral judgments on our actions -- that we at least believe that what we are doing is permissible.
{ 2 } - we can't then make moral judgments to protect our own interests.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
Hare accepts only one of these.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end