What is your answer?
To decide which ultimate ends we ought to pursue, we should appeal to
{ 1 } - what humans desire for its own sake.
{ 2 } - the ends that society approves of.
{ 3 } - self-evident principles.
{ 4 } - God's will.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is correct!
To decide which ultimate ends we ought to pursue, we should appeal to
{ 1 } - what humans desire for its own sake.
{ 2 } - the ends that society approves of.
{ 3 } - self-evident principles.
{ 4 } - God's will.
Like Aristotle, Mill connects what is good with what humans desire.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
To decide which ultimate ends we ought to pursue, we should appeal to
{ 1 } - what humans desire for its own sake.
{ 2 } - the ends that society approves of.
{ 3 } - self-evident principles.
{ 4 } - God's will.
This isn't Mill's criterion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
To decide which ultimate ends we ought to pursue, we should appeal to
{ 1 } - what humans desire for its own sake.
{ 2 } - the ends that society approves of.
{ 3 } - self-evident principles.
{ 4 } - God's will.
Mill rejects this "intuitive" approach in favor of the "inductive" (empirical) approach.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
To decide which ultimate ends we ought to pursue, we should appeal to
{ 1 } - what humans desire for its own sake.
{ 2 } - the ends that society approves of.
{ 3 } - self-evident principles.
{ 4 } - God's will.
This isn't Mill's criterion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end