What is your answer?
The reason that "good" can't be defined is that it's
{ 1 } - an emotive term with no factual meaning.
{ 2 } - too complicated for our little minds.
{ 3 } - a simple idea.
{ 4 } - an ambiguous term.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The reason that "good" can't be defined is that it's
{ 1 } - an emotive term with no factual meaning.
{ 2 } - too complicated for our little minds.
{ 3 } - a simple idea.
{ 4 } - an ambiguous term.
Moore didn't hold this, but some later thinkers did.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The reason that "good" can't be defined is that it's
{ 1 } - an emotive term with no factual meaning.
{ 2 } - too complicated for our little minds.
{ 3 } - a simple idea.
{ 4 } - an ambiguous term.
Complicated things can be defined by analyzing them into simpler parts.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
The reason that "good" can't be defined is that it's
{ 1 } - an emotive term with no factual meaning.
{ 2 } - too complicated for our little minds.
{ 3 } - a simple idea.
{ 4 } - an ambiguous term.
Simple ideas can't be defined -- can't be analyzed into simpler parts.
If you deny that such simple ideas exist, then try to define the little word "not" using simpler terms. You won't succeed!
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The reason that "good" can't be defined is that it's
{ 1 } - an emotive term with no factual meaning.
{ 2 } - too complicated for our little minds.
{ 3 } - a simple idea.
{ 4 } - an ambiguous term.
Moore didn't hold this, but some later thinkers did.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end