According to Ayer, the great minds in the history of philosophy dealt
According to Ayer, the great minds in the history of philosophy dealt
He admits that there's much metaphysics in the history of philosophy. He sees metaphysics as nonsensical, since it tries to make nonanalytic statements that aren't empirically verifiable.
But he also sees much language analysis in the history of philosophy. For example, Locke tried to analyze "substance," Berkeley tried to analyze "material object," and Hume tried to analyze "cause." He also claims that the work of Plato, Aristotle, and Kant is primarily analytic. Thus the definition of philosophy as "language analysis" accords with what much of what traditional philosophers did.
According to Ayer, the great minds in the history of philosophy dealt
He admits that there's much metaphysics in the history of philosophy. He sees metaphysics as nonsensical, since it tries to make nonanalytic statements that aren't empirically verifiable.
But he also sees much language analysis in the history of philosophy. For example, Locke tried to analyze "substance," Berkeley tried to analyze "material object," and Hume tried to analyze "cause." He also claims that the work of Plato, Aristotle, and Kant is primarily analytic. Thus the definition of philosophy as "language analysis" accords with what much of what traditional philosophers did.
According to Ayer, the great minds in the history of philosophy dealt
He admits that there's much metaphysics in the history of philosophy. He sees metaphysics as nonsensical, since it tries to make nonanalytic statements that aren't empirically verifiable.
But he also sees much language analysis in the history of philosophy. For example, Locke tried to analyze "substance," Berkeley tried to analyze "material object," and Hume tried to analyze "cause." He also claims that the work of Plato, Aristotle, and Kant is primarily analytic. Thus the definition of philosophy as "language analysis" accords with what much of what traditional philosophers did.