What is your answer?
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
He doesn't think that we can give a strict proof here.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
He doesn't think that we can give a strict proof here.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
He doesn't think that we can give a strict proof here.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
He doesn't think that we can give a strict proof here.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
He doesn't think that we can give a strict proof in such cases.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is correct!
Chisholm thinks we can
{ 1 } - prove moral principles from how we feel.
{ 2 } - prove the existence of external objects from our sensations.
{ 3 } - prove the existence of God from facts about the universe or about our religious feelings.
{ 4 } - prove the existence of other minds from external behavior.
{ 5 } - all of the above.
{ 6 } - none of the above.
For such cases, he rejects strict proofs; instead, he claims that the data in question can provide us with some sort of evidence -- and can make our beliefs reasonable or evident.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end