What is your answer?
Ima Supernaturalist defines "God" as
{ 1 } - "the all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 2 } - "the all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 3 } - none of these -- God is infinitely above us, and so we can't define God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
1 is correct!
Ima Supernaturalist defines "God" as
{ 1 } - "the all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 2 } - "the all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 3 } - none of these -- God is infinitely above us, and so we can't define God.
Adding "all-good" would make her definitions circular (since she'd use "God" to define "good," and "good" to define "God"). It also would suggest that there are standards of goodness prior to God's will (instead of God's will creating the standards).
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Supernaturalist defines "God" as
{ 1 } - "the all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 2 } - "the all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 3 } - none of these -- God is infinitely above us, and so we can't define God.
Adding "all-good" would make her definitions circular (since she'd use "God" to define "good," and "good" to define "God"). It also would suggest that there are standards of goodness prior to God's will (instead of God's will creating the standards).
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Supernaturalist defines "God" as
{ 1 } - "the all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 2 } - "the all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing Creator of the world."
{ 3 } - none of these -- God is infinitely above us, and so we can't define God.
While Ima would agree that God is infinitely above us, she'd say that we can define the word "God" -- in the sense of saying what we mean by the word.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end