What is your answer?

Ima Emotivist thinks that the reason we can't define "good" in descriptive terms is that

    { 1 } - "good" is emotional.
    { 2 } - "good" is ambiguous.
    { 3 } - "good" is an objective, irreducible concept.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- she defines "good" as "empirical."

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

Ima Emotivist thinks that the reason we can't define "good" in descriptive terms is that

Since "good" is emotional, it's not equivalent to descriptive phrases (like "socially approved") that doesn't express positive or negative feelings.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that the reason we can't define "good" in descriptive terms is that

    { 1 } - "good" is emotional.
    { 2 } - "good" is ambiguous.
    { 3 } - "good" is an objective, irreducible concept.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- she defines "good" as "empirical."

This isn't what she says.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that the reason we can't define "good" in descriptive terms is that

    { 1 } - "good" is emotional.
    { 2 } - "good" is ambiguous.
    { 3 } - "good" is an objective, irreducible concept.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- she defines "good" as "empirical."

This is what intuitionists hold.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that the reason we can't define "good" in descriptive terms is that

    { 1 } - "good" is emotional.
    { 2 } - "good" is ambiguous.
    { 3 } - "good" is an objective, irreducible concept.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- she defines "good" as "empirical."

Have you been sniffing the glue in Ima's chemistry lab?

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end