What is your answer?

Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism is accurate linguistically. As evidence, she points to an experiment that she did with her boyfriend at a restaurant. They both agreed to switch from "good" to "hurrah," and from "bad" to "boo." They found that they could express everything that they wanted to say.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism is accurate linguistically. As evidence, she points to an experiment that she did with her boyfriend at a restaurant. They both agreed to switch from "good" to "hurrah," and from "bad" to "boo." They found that they could express everything that they wanted to say.

This is what she says. However, they seem not to have used certain forms which are difficult to put into exclamations, such as these:

    1. Do what is good.
    2. Hurrah for good people!
    3. Either it's good to go or it's bad to go.
    4. This is neutral (neither good nor bad).

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism is accurate linguistically. As evidence, she points to an experiment that she did with her boyfriend at a restaurant. They both agreed to switch from "good" to "hurrah," and from "bad" to "boo." They found that they could express everything that they wanted to say.

This is what she says.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end