What is your answer?

One problem with emotivism is that moral judgments don't always translate plausibly into exclamations.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

One problem with emotivism is that moral judgments don't always translate plausibly into exclamations.

Emotivism says that all moral judgments are emotional exclamations -- like "Boo!" and "Hurrah!" But many forms, such as the four below, seem to have no plausible "hurrah" and "boo" equivalents:

    1. Do what is good.
    2. Hurrah for good people!
    3. Either it's good to go or it's bad to go.
    4. This is neutral (neither good nor bad).

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

One problem with emotivism is that moral judgments don't always translate plausibly into exclamations.

Emotivism says that all moral judgments are emotional exclamations -- like "Boo!" and "Hurrah!" But many forms, such as the four below, seem to have no plausible "hurrah" and "boo" equivalents:

    1. Do what is good.
    2. Hurrah for good people!
    3. Either it's good to go or it's bad to go.
    4. This is neutral (neither good nor bad).

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end