What is the best match?
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
intrinsically good <=> What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
Hume's law <=> We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
empirical statement <=> Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
moderate emotivism <=> Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Hume's law
{ 1 } - What is good in itself, abstracting from further consequences
{ 2 } - We can't deduce an "ought" from an "is." Equivalently, we need a moral premise to deduce a moral conclusion.
{ 3 } - Statement that is testable by sense experience (and thus can in principle be shown by sense experience to be true or at least highly probable)
{ 4 } - Moral judgments, while they express emotions and not truth claims, are rational to the extent that they are informed and impartial
{ 5 } - Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
prescription (imperative) <=> Linguistic form, like "Shut the door," that tells what to do instead of making a truth claim
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end