What is the best match?
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
We know through our actual or ideal moral intuitions that we ought to be consistent. <=> intuitionism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
Our judgments against inconsistency simply express our (actual or ideal) feelings against inconsistency. <=> emotivism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
We avoid inconsistencies because we desire to be rational (and hence consistent). <=> idealistic-desire justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided. <=> prima-facie-duty justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Inconsistency is an inherently bad cognitive state that ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - emotivism justification
{ 3 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 4 } - prima-facie-duty justification
{ 5 } - cultural-relativism justification
We ought to avoid inconsistency because society demands this (perhaps because it couldn't survive without consistency). <=> cultural-relativism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end