What is your answer?
Correct formulations of the golden rule involve
{ 1 } - a don't-combine form.
{ 2 } - a present attitude to a hypothetical situation.
{ 3 } - a similar situation qualifier.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Correct formulations of the golden rule involve
{ 1 } - a don't-combine form.
{ 2 } - a present attitude to a hypothetical situation.
{ 3 } - a similar situation qualifier.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
You need "don't-combine" instead of "if-then." But you need more besides this.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Correct formulations of the golden rule involve
{ 1 } - a don't-combine form.
{ 2 } - a present attitude to a hypothetical situation.
{ 3 } - a similar situation qualifier.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
GR needs to refer to your present desire about how you be treated in a hypothetical case. But you need more besides this.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Correct formulations of the golden rule involve
{ 1 } - a don't-combine form.
{ 2 } - a present attitude to a hypothetical situation.
{ 3 } - a similar situation qualifier.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
You need something like "in an exactly similar situation" or "in the reversed situation." But you need more besides this.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Correct formulations of the golden rule involve
{ 1 } - a don't-combine form.
{ 2 } - a present attitude to a hypothetical situation.
{ 3 } - a similar situation qualifier.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
If any of these factors are lacking, then the formulation will likely lead to absurdities and won't be provable from our axioms.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end