What is your answer?

The problem with the intuitionist's appeal to self-evident moral truths is that

    { 1 } - all truths are empirical, and hence no truths are self-evident.
    { 2 } - there's no conceivable empirical test to decide whether the alleged moral truths are in fact true.
    { 3 } - both of these are problems.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

The problem with the intuitionist's appeal to self-evident moral truths is that

Ayer didn't think that all truths were empirical.

Ayer accepted some non-empirical truths, namely analytic ones based on logic and the definition of terms. An example would be "All bachelors are single." We know that this is true, not by doing an empirical investigation, but by understanding the terms and logical connections.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

The problem with the intuitionist's appeal to self-evident moral truths is that

    { 1 } - all truths are empirical, and hence no truths are self-evident.
    { 2 } - there's no conceivable empirical test to decide whether the alleged moral truths are in fact true.
    { 3 } - both of these are problems.

These alleged moral truths aren't empirically verifiable and aren't true by definition. So it follows by the verifiability criterion of meaning that they are cognitively meaningless: they make no true or false assertions.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

The problem with the intuitionist's appeal to self-evident moral truths is that

    { 1 } - all truths are empirical, and hence no truths are self-evident.
    { 2 } - there's no conceivable empirical test to decide whether the alleged moral truths are in fact true.
    { 3 } - both of these are problems.

Ayer didn't think that all truths were empirical.

Ayer accepted some non-empirical truths, namely analytic ones based on logic and the definition of terms. An example would be "All bachelors are single." We know that this is true, not by doing an empirical investigation, but by understanding the terms and logical connections.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end