What is your answer?

The "cosmological argument" says that

    { 1 } - the mere concept of a supremely perfect being requires that this being exist.
    { 2 } - the order and design that we discover in the world shows that there must be a supreme mind who formed the world.
    { 3 } - the mere existence of the world requires an explanation -- and this explanation can only be God.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

The "cosmological argument" says that

This is the "ontological argument."

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

The "cosmological argument" says that

    { 1 } - the mere concept of a supremely perfect being requires that this being exist.
    { 2 } - the order and design that we discover in the world shows that there must be a supreme mind who formed the world.
    { 3 } - the mere existence of the world requires an explanation -- and this explanation can only be God.

This is the "teleological argument" (also called the "argument from design").

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

The "cosmological argument" says that

    { 1 } - the mere concept of a supremely perfect being requires that this being exist.
    { 2 } - the order and design that we discover in the world shows that there must be a supreme mind who formed the world.
    { 3 } - the mere existence of the world requires an explanation -- and this explanation can only be God.

The "third way" of St. Thomas Aquinas argues that the existence of contingent beings (beings whose non-existence is possible) requires that there be a necessary being (a being whose non-existence is impossible). This necessary being is God.

Another form of the argument says that there must be a first cause -- a being that brought other things into existence, while nothing brought it into existence.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end