What is your answer?
Suppose that McX claims that certain things exist (like minds or numbers), while I disagree. We can best describe our difference by saying that
{ 1 } - there are entities (like minds or numbers) that McX recognizes but I don't.
{ 2 } - McX thinks that there are entities in a given category (e.g. minds or numbers) -- but I think that there are no such entities of those sorts.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Suppose that McX claims that certain things exist (like minds or numbers), while I disagree. We can best describe our difference by saying that
{ 1 } - there are entities (like minds or numbers) that McX recognizes but I don't.
{ 2 } - McX thinks that there are entities in a given category (e.g. minds or numbers) -- but I think that there are no such entities of those sorts.
But I won't agree that these things are really entities. So this answer involves me in an inconsistency.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Suppose that McX claims that certain things exist (like minds or numbers), while I disagree. We can best describe our difference by saying that
{ 1 } - there are entities (like minds or numbers) that McX recognizes but I don't.
{ 2 } - McX thinks that there are entities in a given category (e.g. minds or numbers) -- but I think that there are no such entities of those sorts.
This way of putting the disagreement is better, because it doesn't presume that there are entities of the sort in question. The other answer involves me in an inconsistency.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end