What is your answer?

Quine suggests that we should accept the simplest ontology that fits our experience. But which of these two ontologies is simpler?

    { 1 } - a physicalist scheme -- which sees material objects as ultimately existing entities in their own right.
    { 2 } - a phenomenalist scheme -- which accepts sensations as ultimately existing entities and tries to analyze material objects in terms of sensations.
    { 3 } - each of these is simpler in one way and more complex in another.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Quine suggests that we should accept the simplest ontology that fits our experience. But which of these two ontologies is simpler?

The phenomenalist scheme is simpler in that it accepts fewer kinds of entity. But the physicalist scheme leads to simpler laws of physics. So each of the views is simpler in one way and more complex in another. So simplicity can be an ambiguous criterion.

For this reason, Quine suggests that we need to develop conflicting ontological views as far as we can -- as we attempt to see which will ultimately prove to be the best.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Quine suggests that we should accept the simplest ontology that fits our experience. But which of these two ontologies is simpler?

    { 1 } - a physicalist scheme -- which sees material objects as ultimately existing entities in their own right.
    { 2 } - a phenomenalist scheme -- which accepts sensations as ultimately existing entities and tries to analyze material objects in terms of sensations.
    { 3 } - each of these is simpler in one way and more complex in another.

The phenomenalist scheme is simpler in that it accepts fewer kinds of entity. But the physicalist scheme leads to simpler laws of physics. So each of the views is simpler in one way and more complex in another. So simplicity can be an ambiguous criterion.

For this reason, Quine suggests that we need to develop conflicting ontological views as far as we can -- as we attempt to see which will ultimately prove to be the best.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

Quine suggests that we should accept the simplest ontology that fits our experience. But which of these two ontologies is simpler?

    { 1 } - a physicalist scheme -- which sees material objects as ultimately existing entities in their own right.
    { 2 } - a phenomenalist scheme -- which accepts sensations as ultimately existing entities and tries to analyze material objects in terms of sensations.
    { 3 } - each of these is simpler in one way and more complex in another.

The phenomenalist scheme is simpler in that it accepts fewer kinds of entity. But the physicalist scheme leads to simpler laws of physics. So each of the views is simpler in one way and more complex in another. So simplicity can be an ambiguous criterion.

For this reason, Quine suggests that we need to develop conflicting ontological views as far as we can -- as we attempt to see which will ultimately prove to be the best.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end