What is your answer?

Ima Emotivist thinks that we can reason about a basic moral principle by appealing to

    { 1 } - God's will.
    { 2 } - what we'd feel if we were informed and impartial.
    { 3 } - social conventions.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- we can't reason about a basic moral principle.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that we can reason about a basic moral principle by appealing to

    { 1 } - God's will.
    { 2 } - what we'd feel if we were informed and impartial.
    { 3 } - social conventions.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- we can't reason about a basic moral principle.

This is supernaturalism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that we can reason about a basic moral principle by appealing to

    { 1 } - God's will.
    { 2 } - what we'd feel if we were informed and impartial.
    { 3 } - social conventions.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- we can't reason about a basic moral principle.

This is the ideal observer view -- or moderate emotivism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Ima Emotivist thinks that we can reason about a basic moral principle by appealing to

    { 1 } - God's will.
    { 2 } - what we'd feel if we were informed and impartial.
    { 3 } - social conventions.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- we can't reason about a basic moral principle.

This is cultural relativism.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is correct!

Ima Emotivist thinks that we can reason about a basic moral principle by appealing to

    { 1 } - God's will.
    { 2 } - what we'd feel if we were informed and impartial.
    { 3 } - social conventions.
    { 4 } - none of the above -- we can't reason about a basic moral principle.

Ima talks about a moral argument with a Nazi. She says that you're likely to reach an impasse on some basic moral principle. Maybe you hold that all races are to be treated with respect, while he thinks that his race is to be treated better. This difference is based on feelings -- and can't be resolved by reasoning. But we might progress further by trying to change the Nazi's feelings about other races.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end