What is your answer?
Ima Emotivist thinks that emotivism gives a simple explanation of morality, because
{ 1 } - it says that evaluative judgments express positive or negative feelings -- a simple explanation.
{ 2 } - it avoids bringing in things like God or objective moral facts -- which are difficult to explain and defend.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
{ 4 } - neither of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist thinks that emotivism gives a simple explanation of morality, because
{ 1 } - it says that evaluative judgments express positive or negative feelings -- a simple explanation.
{ 2 } - it avoids bringing in things like God or objective moral facts -- which are difficult to explain and defend.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
{ 4 } - neither of the above.
She also brings in the other point.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist thinks that emotivism gives a simple explanation of morality, because
{ 1 } - it says that evaluative judgments express positive or negative feelings -- a simple explanation.
{ 2 } - it avoids bringing in things like God or objective moral facts -- which are difficult to explain and defend.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
{ 4 } - neither of the above.
She also brings in the other point.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Ima Emotivist thinks that emotivism gives a simple explanation of morality, because
{ 1 } - it says that evaluative judgments express positive or negative feelings -- a simple explanation.
{ 2 } - it avoids bringing in things like God or objective moral facts -- which are difficult to explain and defend.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
{ 4 } - neither of the above.
This simplicity is a point in favor of emotivism. But, on the other hand, the truth isn't always simple -- and emotivism seems to water down what morality is.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist thinks that emotivism gives a simple explanation of morality, because
{ 1 } - it says that evaluative judgments express positive or negative feelings -- a simple explanation.
{ 2 } - it avoids bringing in things like God or objective moral facts -- which are difficult to explain and defend.
{ 3 } - both of the above.
{ 4 } - neither of the above.
She brings in both points!
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end