What is your answer?

The claim that moral judgments are universalizable

    { 1 } - is a logical principle.
    { 2 } - tells us how we ought to live.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

The claim that moral judgments are universalizable

This claim says that moral judgments logically commit us to making similar evaluations about similar cases. If we violate this, then our moral judgments are inconsistent with each other.

This is a consistency rule. It isn't an imperative or moral judgment. It doesn't say "We ought to do such and such ..." Instead, it tell us what we must do if we're to be logically consistent in our moral beliefs.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

The claim that moral judgments are universalizable

    { 1 } - is a logical principle.
    { 2 } - tells us how we ought to live.

This claim says that moral judgments logically commit us to making similar evaluations about similar cases. If we violate this, then our moral judgments are inconsistent with each other.

This is a consistency rule. It isn't an imperative or moral judgment. It doesn't say "We ought to do such and such ..." Instead, it tell us what we must do if we're to be logically consistent in our moral beliefs.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end