What is your answer?
If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that
{ 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
{ 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that
{ 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
{ 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that
{ 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
{ 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that
{ 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
{ 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that
{ 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
{ 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
{ 4 } - all of the above.
We'd teach conformity. We'd teach our children to be uncritical about the norms of their society. We'd teach them that accepted norms can't be wrong -- even if they come from stupidity and ignorance.
CR goes against the critical spirit that characterizes philosophy.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end