What is your answer?

If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that

    { 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
    { 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 4 } - all of the above.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that

We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that

    { 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
    { 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 4 } - all of the above.

We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that

    { 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
    { 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 4 } - all of the above.

We'd teach this; but we'd also teach the other things.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is correct!

If we followed the logical implications of cultural relativism, then we'd teach our children about morality by teaching them, for example, that

    { 1 } - getting drunk on Friday night and then driving home would be good if their peer-group society approved of it.
    { 2 } - racism would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 3 } - intolerance would be good if their society approved of it.
    { 4 } - all of the above.

We'd teach conformity. We'd teach our children to be uncritical about the norms of their society. We'd teach them that accepted norms can't be wrong -- even if they come from stupidity and ignorance.

CR goes against the critical spirit that characterizes philosophy.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end