Ima Rossian thinks that we have duties to do good to others (beneficence) and not harm others (nonmaleficence). She interprets "good" and "harm" in terms of
Ima Rossian thinks that we have duties to do good to others (beneficence) and not harm others (nonmaleficence). She interprets "good" and "harm" in terms of
This is the hedonistic view, which she rejects.
Ima Rossian thinks that we have duties to do good to others (beneficence) and not harm others (nonmaleficence). She interprets "good" and "harm" in terms of
This is Ross's view. Ima adds life and freedom to Ross's list.
Ima Rossian thinks that we have duties to do good to others (beneficence) and not harm others (nonmaleficence). She interprets "good" and "harm" in terms of
Ima is a pluralist. She thinks that a wide range of things are intrinsically good.
So to do good to another is to promote the virtue, knowledge, pleasure, life, or freedom of the other person. And to harm is bring vice, ignorance, pain, death, or bondage.