What is the best match?
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
We know through our actual or ideal moral intuitions that universalizability is true and that we ought to be impartial. <=> intuitionism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
We strive for impartiality because it promotes our desire to be fair toward others. <=> idealistic-desire justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
We ought to accept universalizability and impartiality because these have a crucial social function. They make possible important kinds of moral reasoning, and they promote a neutral standpoint for settling disputes and reaching a moral consensus. These make life better for everyone. <=> utilitarianism justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
We ought to be impartial because God desires this. <=> divine-command-theory justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided.
{ 1 } - intuitionism justification
{ 2 } - idealistic-desire justification
{ 3 } - utilitarianism justification
{ 4 } - divine-command-theory justification
{ 5 } - prima-facie-duty justification
Violating impartiality is inherently bad and thus ought other-things-equal to be avoided. <=> prima-facie-duty justification
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end