What is your answer?
Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism explains more of the facts about morality. She gives this example:
{ 1 } - The reason we can't define "good" in purely descriptive terms is that "good" is emotional.
{ 2 } - The reason we humans differ so much in our moral beliefs is that we have different feelings about things.
{ 3 } - The reason we can't resolve basic moral differences intellectually is that these differences are emotional (and so not purely intellectual).
{ 4 } - She gives all of these examples.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism explains more of the facts about morality. She gives this example:
{ 1 } - The reason we can't define "good" in purely descriptive terms is that "good" is emotional.
{ 2 } - The reason we humans differ so much in our moral beliefs is that we have different feelings about things.
{ 3 } - The reason we can't resolve basic moral differences intellectually is that these differences are emotional (and so not purely intellectual).
{ 4 } - She gives all of these examples.
She gives the other examples too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism explains more of the facts about morality. She gives this example:
{ 1 } - The reason we can't define "good" in purely descriptive terms is that "good" is emotional.
{ 2 } - The reason we humans differ so much in our moral beliefs is that we have different feelings about things.
{ 3 } - The reason we can't resolve basic moral differences intellectually is that these differences are emotional (and so not purely intellectual).
{ 4 } - She gives all of these examples.
She gives the other examples too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism explains more of the facts about morality. She gives this example:
{ 1 } - The reason we can't define "good" in purely descriptive terms is that "good" is emotional.
{ 2 } - The reason we humans differ so much in our moral beliefs is that we have different feelings about things.
{ 3 } - The reason we can't resolve basic moral differences intellectually is that these differences are emotional (and so not purely intellectual).
{ 4 } - She gives all of these examples.
She gives the other examples too.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Ima Emotivist claims that emotivism explains more of the facts about morality. She gives this example:
{ 1 } - The reason we can't define "good" in purely descriptive terms is that "good" is emotional.
{ 2 } - The reason we humans differ so much in our moral beliefs is that we have different feelings about things.
{ 3 } - The reason we can't resolve basic moral differences intellectually is that these differences are emotional (and so not purely intellectual).
{ 4 } - She gives all of these examples.
She says that morality becomes more understandable when we take the emotivist view.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end